Be our Friend    

   
Text Size
Login Newsletter Sign-up

Keyword Search HCX for your Favorite Author / Content

Why Employers Will Continue to Provide Health Insurance

Digg it!Share in FacebookTweet it!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

healthcareThe Impact of the Affordable Care Act

An issue brief funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation as part of its Quick Strike Series considers how employers might react to provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and offers an analysis of factors that are likely to influence their decisions to drop or retain employer-sponsored insurance (ESI).

The Urban Institute authors state that the ACA will leave ESI largely intact, but that decisions to continue or drop ESI will come down to whether employers and their employees stand to benefit more from ESI or coverage available through state insurance exchanges.

The authors contend:

  • Better-paid workers remain better off with ESI.
  • Employers will likely only drop coverage if most workers would benefit from switching to the exchange.
  • Employers are unlikely to drop coverage due to complexities in assessing employees' preferences.
  • Employers are unlikely to make decisions to encourage some employees to drop coverage and not others.

The brief examines the ACA's coverage provisions, current tax subsidies and workforce characteristics to identify: (1) which option provides the best scenario for attracting and retaining a skilled, loyal workforce; (2) how employee demographics will influence employers' decisions on offering coverage; and (3) what eliminating ESI will mean in terms of true costs associated with employer penalties and as increased employee compensation.

Get full text or downloads

By: Blumberg L, Buettgens M, Feder J and Holahan J

Publisher: Urban Institute

Published: October 2011

##

Comments:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Author of this article: Urban Institute
More articles :

» How not to win your Employment lawsuits

Woman charged with intimidating judge overseeing her suit against SeyfarthA Massachusetts woman who brought pro se lawsuits against Seyfarth Shaw and her former employer is facing criminal charges for a letter she sent to a Boston federal judge and...

» EEOC Sues Staffing Agency for Sex Harassment, Retaliation, and Assigning Workers Based on Sex

Source One Staffing Assigned Women to a Known Hostile Work Environment and Engaged in Sex Stereotyping When Making Job Assignments, Federal Agency SaysCHICAGO – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed a class lawsuit...

» EEOC - Pre-Employment Inquiries and Arrest & Conviction

There is no Federal law that clearly prohibits an employer from asking about arrest and conviction records. However, using such records as an absolute measure to prevent an individual from being hired could limit the employment opportunities of some...

» Protecting Trade Secrets Through Employee Surveillance: Risky Business

The difference between having a trade secret and not can come down to the steps that a company takes to protect its secrets.  The Uniform Trade Secrets Act, a version of which has been adopted in , provides that information qualifies for trade...

» Californian IT workers fired for being Americans

• Lawyer says visa loophole being used to hire foreigners for cheap, pink-slip U.S. workersOn April 22, 2011 attorney James Otto filed a pioneering lawsuit against Long Beach, Calif.’s Molina Healthcare, Inc., alleging that the 21 clients he is...