HireCentrix News - News Articles

Seventh Circuit Upholds Pro-Employer Method of Overtime Calculation for Misclassified Employees

Written by Jackson Lewis, LLP Monday, 09 August 2010 00:00

The Fair Labor Standards Act requires employers to pay non-exempt employees one and one half times their regular rate of pay for any hours worked in a workweek in excess of 40. United States Department of Labor regulations, as set forth in 29 C.F.R. § 778.114(a), allow an employer to utilize the fluctuating workweek (“FWW”) method of overtime payment.

Pursuant to FWW, in determining overtime due, an employer pides the weekly wage by the total number of hours worked during the week and then pays additional half-time for overtime hours. The more overtime hours worked, the lower the regular rate of pay and the overtime due for each overtime hour.

One would think that if a salaried employee is found to have been misclassified as non-exempt, this same formula should be applied in determining any overtime due. However, while the federal appellate courts have applies such formula, some district courts have taken the position that any overtime must be calculated by piding the salary by 40 to determine the regular rate and paying 1.5 times the regular rate for all overtime hours. The difference in calculations can be significant as demonstrated by the following examples.

SALARY: $1,000

HOURS WORKED: 50

Half-time calculation (FWW): $1000/50 hours = $20/hour regular rate of pay/2 = $10 times 10 overtime hours -=$100 due

Time-and-a-half calculation: $1000/40 hours = $25/hour regular rate of pay X 1.5 = $37.50 times 10 overtime hours = $375 due

The difference between the amounts of overtime due under these two calculation methods is always at least three-fold. As the number of hours in the workweek increases, the spread between the two methods grows.

Earlier this week, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit endorsed the first FWW-type calculation. See Urnikis-Negro v. Am. Family Prop. Servs., — F.3d. —, No. 08-3117, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16126 (7th Cir. 2010).

< Prev		Next >

» OFCCP Takes Initial Steps to Require Burdensome Reporting of Compensation Data

In an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) published in the Federal Register on August 10, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) solicits public comments on a proposed requirement that contractors submit extensive...

» The Impetus for HR Standards

A Twitter discussion caught my eye earlier; it was about HR not having standards for measurements. HR not having standards is a problem that is truly harmful to the industry at large because of the following reasons:1. Not having rigorous standards...

» USCCR Briefing Report Recommends Scrapping EEOC Guidelines on English-Only Policies

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (“USCCR” or “Commission”) has issued a briefing report – (pdf) – recommending that an employer’s English-only policy be deemed unlawful only if such policies are enacted to harass, embarrass, or...

» The Simple Brilliance of JOHN LEWIS

The Candidate does the ClosingJohn Lewis was a recruiter, trainer and manager. Even though he possessed a BSEE, he excelled at everything he tried in the recruitment business—a business that is so oriented toward people with sales experience...

» For Engineers Who Hate Networking

"Hello, I'm Gary Perman. I'm a headhunter; an industry insider in the fields of electric vehicles, alternative energy, and electronics. Technology companies hire me to find their next executive, manager, or engineer."Sometimes it seems like I hit...