Be our Friend    

   
Text Size
Login Newsletter Sign-up

Keyword Search HCX for your Favorite Author / Content

NY - Disabled Department of Finance Staff Targeted for Layoff File Lawsuit

Digg it!Share in FacebookTweet it!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Disabled Department of Finance Staff Targeted for Layoff File Lawsuit in New York Supreme Court Charging Violation of City’s Human Rights Law

District Council 37, which represents workers, says DOF layoffs disproportionately impact the disabled (New York, N.Y.) – On Monday, May, 2, 2011, 37 employees of the New York City Department of Finance filed a lawsuit in the NYS Supreme Court charging that plans to lay off city workers, all of whom are disabled, violate the City’s Human Rights Law. The layoffs are slated to take place on May 6, 2011.

Defendants in the lawsuit are the New York City Department of Finance, Department of Finance Commissioner David Frankel, the City of New York and Michael R. Bloomberg as Mayor of New York.

Initially, in November 2010, the Department of Finance, which has a workforce of roughly 2,300 employees, announced its intention to layoff approximately 129 employees. Of those employees, 78  held the entry-level job title of Office Machine Aide (OMA) performing a variety of tasks that include data entry, clerical work, handling mail and assisting with the public. They earn approximately $35,000/year. All of those employees have worked at the DOF for close to a decade.

Historically, the title of Office Machine Aide (OMA) has been used by the DOF to employ persons with disabilities. An overwhelming majority of the OMAs slated for layoff participate in the city’s 55-A program which permits the disabled to obtain civil service status without having to take competitive exams. In fact, many were first employed at the DOF as participants in FedCap, a nonprofit organization whose mission was to provide training and job placement for the disabled.

Each of the DOF employees has a diagnosed disability, which includes disabilities from deafness, dyslexia, diabetes, and vision impairment to HIV status and liver disease.

They are represented in court by attorneys from their union, District Council 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, and James A. Brown, from the law office of Brown & Gropper LLP and are seeking a preliminary injunction to enjoin the May 6th layoffs pending the outcome of their disability discrimination lawsuit. 

District Council 37 is New York City’s largest public employee union, with 125,000 members and 50,000 retirees.

Contact:
Zita Allen, Communications Director
Molly Charboneau
Rudy Orozco
212-815-1535

SOURCE District Council 37

Comments:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Author of this article: District Council 37
More articles :

» Have human resources assist in writing business plan

Writing a business plan can be a hard task for entrepreneurs, but those lucky enough to have access to a human resources practitioner (HRP) or a veteran human resources (HR) manager on staff may complete the job faster with assistance from that HR...

» Report:More than One Quarte or California work force are Immigrants

The Political and Economic Power of Immigrants, Latinos, and Asians in the Golden State (Updated January 2012)More than one quarter of Californians are immigrants.More than one in four California residents are foreign born, but almost 46 % of them,...

» Teams Win - Solo Recruiters Struggle

There’s been a lot of struggle going on in the recruiting profession since about 2008-2009 when the downturn began accelerating and taking form.I can tell how it is impacting the industry, even though my observation is based on not necessarily the...

» 5 Reasons Why Recruiters Are Using Twitter for Recruitment — and why jobseekers should take notice!

 #1 Twitter is free; and with the cost of business sometimes being a hefty burden, even recruitment firms can’t resist the charms of a no-cost, useful online tool. For recruiters seeing a decline in assignments, free services such as Twitter can...

» Unemployment Insurance Benefits Don’t Prevent Job Searching Debunking the Conservative Myth

Conservatives often claim that unemployment insurance, or UI benefits discourage the unemployed from seeking employment. They argue that reduced job seeking on the part of the unemployed actually increases unemployment as people choose to rely on...