Be our Friend    

   
Text Size
Login Newsletter Sign-up

Keyword Search HCX for your Favorite Author / Content

IRS Issues Guidance on Form W-2 Reporting for Costs of Employer-Provided Coverage

Digg it!Share in FacebookTweet it!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

On March 29, 2011, the IRS issued Notice 2011-28, which provides greater clarity to employers in connection with how to administer new Form W-2 reporting requirements for costs of employer-provided health coverage. This reporting is required under Section 6051(a)(14) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code"), which was added by Section 9002 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA"). The IRS has requested comments on the Notice, which will be due 90 days after the Notice is officially published in the Federal Register.

The reporting requirement was scheduled to become effective for the 2011 tax year, but the IRS issued Notice 2010-69 last October, which delayed enforcement of the requirement until the 2012 tax year (i.e., for Forms W-2 required to be issued by end of January 2013). Notice 2011-28 provides further transitional relief for certain employers as described below.

It is important for employers to begin working with their health care and payroll providers now to ensure that any needed system changes are in place by January 1, 2012. In part, this is because, unlike Notice 2010-69, Notice 2011-28 does not provide any penalty relief for failure to comply with the new reporting requirements. The penalty for such a failure is $200 per Form W-2, up to a maximum of $3 million.

Key provisions from the Notice are summarized below.

Employers Subject to the Reporting Requirement

Except as provided in the Notice's transitional relief described below, virtually all employers that provide "applicable employer-sponsored coverage" under a group health plan must comply with the new reporting requirement. This includes federal, state and local government entities, churches and other religious organizations, and employers that are not subject to the COBRA continuation requirements.

Read More at Littler.com

##

Comments:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Author of this article: Littler
More articles :

» Los Angeles-based Farmers Insurance to pay more than $1.5 million in back wages to nearly 3,500 employees following US Labor Department investigation

Systemic labor violations found throughout call centers in Florida, Kansas, Michigan, Oklahoma, Oregon and Texas LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles-based Farmers Insurance Inc. has agreed to pay $1,520,705 in overtime back wages to 3,459 employees...

» Gender wage gap shrunk faster than previously thought

A University study showed the nationwide gender wage gap closed by 22 percent from 1979 to 2009. Previous reports said the gap had actually closed at 16 percent, according to a University press release.The study showed that the changes in the gap...

» 10 middle-class jobs that are rapidly vanishing

Travel agents, proofreaders, transit security all are seeing big declines“The American dream is dead for the majority of America,” financial guru Suze Orman told Forbes last year, speaking about her upcoming book "The Money Class."The dream...

» Court requires fired social media employee to return usernames and passwords

Intellectual property law is notoriously bad at keeping up with the technology it is supposed to govern, particularly where the internet is concerned. As a result, business people (and the lawyers who advise them) must be especially careful to cover...

» Oracle Pays $1.9 Billion to Acquire Taleo’s HR Software

In Oracle’s second major acquisition in the past three months, they’ve announced the purchase of Dublin, California-based Taleo Corp for north of $1.9 billion. Taleo’s main offering is a software that manages human resource workflow, and can...