Be our Friend    

   
Text Size
Login Newsletter Sign-up

Keyword Search HCX for your Favorite Author / Content

Incentivising Tomorrow’s Recruiters – its Feedback, not Fees

Digg it!Share in FacebookTweet it!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Historically we have always seen 3rd party recruitment as a sales business. We employ recruiters who are rewarded for their ability to open doors and sell to clients and to place as many people as they can…irrespective of how they do it, and of what experience they deliver to their clients and candidates.  

 

Social media is beginning to change that…whether on LinkedIn, Facebook or Twitter, recruiters now have a relationship with their candidates and clients which is both visible and transparent.

New articles and blogs appear on a daily basis foreseeing the end of traditional recruitment as we know it. Certain themes about the future landscape are showing through, with the clear messages that, post recession, there will be a need to develop deeper, more collaborative relationships with clients, and to pay more attention to building and engaging your candidate community, specifically the ‘Talent Puddle’, the top 10%, if you like, of that community.

Certainly the HR and Recruiting directors that I speak to (and as an HR recruiter I speak to a lot of them, as clients and candidates) are looking for something different from 3rd party recruiters in future.

How do you nurture your ’talent puddle’ if you’re only remunerated on placements?

Well, I don’t know about you guys, but I hate being sold to. If my career, and possibly the future income and stability of myself and my family, were at stake I know that I wouldn’t want to be sold to. Nor would I want think that the person who was advising and helping me was thinking of their bonus cheque and how I could add to it.

I would be much more comfortable, much more trusting, if I knew that their main motivation was in developing a long term relationship with me, and not how much they could make out of me.

Can you develop deep relationships with a bonus model based purely on rewarding sales?

And if I was a hiring manager, looking to build my team and fill some key positions, with a tight recruitment budget, and knowing that my neck was on the block if I screwed up in the hiring, well I wouldn’t want to be sold to either. Certainly I wouldn’t want to be relying on a recruiter who was only looking at how many fees they could get out of me.

I would certainly be much happier, much more trusting, if I knew that their main motivation, again, was in developing a long term relationship with me, and not how much they could make out of me.

How do you incentivise relationship building and service?

Difficult, isn’t it.

After spending many years as a 3rd party recruiter, including nearly 10 placing recruiters, I’m not sure that we’ve ever found a successful way of rewarding RELATIONSHIPS and SERVICE. We still look at volumes and values of placements, and usually still measure activity by volume. Great recruiters are defined by how much they bill, not by how valued their service is.

So how about using feedback as a measure?

Instead of paying your top recruiter by how many placements they make next quarter, try taking feedback from their candidates and clients on how they performed, and on what kind of service they provided? Did it meet or exceed expectation? And did they add real value to the process?

I think you may find surprising results.

Firstly from candidates and clients, who will now have some real input in what will become a true two way relationship, it will bring them closer and give them the opportunity to reflect and comment on your service in a transparent way.

And secondly from your recruiters, who will now be able to invest time and energy in really developing the service to their candidates and clients, taking time to nurture relationships, build their communities, find out what they really want, and create ways to deliver a real value added service. One that they can be proud of.

Who’s up for that challenge??

------------------------

BIOGRAPHY

Mervyn Dinnen  is content & community manager for Jobsite UK, one of the UKs leading job boards. He had previously been a recruiter for 20 years, sourcing talent in finance, HR and marketing. He believes in the value of relationships, engagement and being yourself!  Find Mervyn on his blog T Recs or contact him at   mervyndinnen@btinternet.com 07966 144263

Comments:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Author of this article: Mervyn Dinnen
More articles :

» Cognitive Dissonance Man and the Compensation Data Collection Tool

I'm sure you've heard by now that OFCCP published the on the compensation data collection tool. According to the ANPRM, the purpose of the new tool is "to provide insight into potential problems of pay discrimination by contractors that warrant...

» Workplace law: Company policy may trump workers' comp laws in injury cases

Can an employer require employees to report their workers compensation injuries more quickly than required under Tennessee law? Yes, says the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in a recent opinion. As always, however, the devil is in the...

» Employees Love a Great Boss – One With Coaching Skills

Did you ever have a manager that made you feel infectiously enthusiastic about going to work? Have you ever been so fiercely loyal to a company that you wanted to spend the rest of your career growing with that company?  When coaching skills...

» In Plain Sight: Hidden Wastes that Affect the Viability of Your HR Organization Part 5: Solutions

Every organization and every business enterprises is comprised of processes that they use to conduct the business of their organization. As we stated in Part 1 of this series, organizations like people strive to be the best that they can be.In...

» Health Care Reform – Pending Litigation Cases

Decided on January 31, 2011, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division At issue was whether the government is reaching beyond its constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce by imposing the individual...