Be our Friend    

   
Text Size
Login Newsletter Sign-up

Keyword Search HCX for your Favorite Author / Content

Employers Take Heed: Discrimination Laws Are Not the Same Everywhere

Digg it!Share in FacebookTweet it!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

discrimination laws employers human rights employment lawEmployers that lose discrimination and other cases before the Illinois Human Rights Commission must meet a little-known requirement before filing an appeal.

According to Illinois courts, employers must first ask the commission to reconsider every ruling in an employee's favor. If not met, this condition, which stems from the need under Illinois law to exhaust all administrative remedies available before appealing to the local circuit court, can trap an employer and doom an appeal.

For the past few years, employees alleging discrimination under state law have had the option of either filing a charge with the Illinois Department of Human Rights (IDHR) or filing a lawsuit in court. Previously, employees had to file charges with the IDHR and try their cases before the commission.

Many employees, however, still elect to file an IDHR charge instead of suing in court. Once an employee chooses this non-judicial route, Illinois law requires that both the employee and the employer exhaust all administrative remedies available.

The IDHR first conducts an informal hearing to learn about the facts and decide whether sufficient evidence exists that discrimination may have occurred. If the IDHR determines that it does, then an administrative law judge at the commission holds a trial in which both the employee and the employer present all available evidence.

After the trial, the judge makes a recommended decision to a three-member panel of the commission. That panel then issues a final order, which is equivalent to a verdict in court.

Read More

Robert Neiman


Comments:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Author of this article: Robert Neiman
More articles :

» Cozy Hiring Agreements used as Evidence in Anti Trust Poaching Class-Action

The Evidence Demonstrates that  Google, Apple, Intel, Intuit, Pixar and Adobe, Conspired To Manipulate and Keep Wages LowWe all know that high-tech firms do their best to retain valuable employees. Salaries and stock options are just the...

» Ewing manufacturing company fined for help-wanted ad that excluded jobless

EWING — A Ewing-based manufacturer of ultrasonic cleaning equipment is the first company in the nation to be fined for a help-wanted ad with the phrase "Must be currently employed."In New Jersey, it’s illegal to publish hiring notices that...

» EEOC is reconsidering their policy regarding Criminal Background Checks

Striking the Balance Between Workplace Fairness and Workplace Safety Removing Arbitrary Bars to Hiring People with Arrest and Conviction Records Improves Job Availability, Lowers Crime and Social Costs, Experts Tell EEOC WASHINGTON -- Employers...

» Hertz suspends 34 Muslim shuttle-bus drivers in prayer dispute

Should Muslims have to clock out when they pray? That question arose earlier this week when 34 Muslim shuttle bus drivers were suspended indefinitely by Hertz Rent-A-Car for not clocking out when they went to pray.

» 15 worst Internet privacy scandals of all time

Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Sony named in our Online Privacy Hall of ShameIn honor of National Data Privacy Day this Saturday, Jan. 28, we've put together a list of the 15 worst Internet privacy scandals of all time.These high-profile privacy...