Be our Friend    

   
Text Size
Login Newsletter Sign-up

Keyword Search HCX for your Favorite Author / Content

Employment Class Actions Survive Despite Wal-Mart Ruling

Digg it!Share in FacebookTweet it!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

employment class actionThe end of the road for a class-action discrimination lawsuit brought by female employees of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has not spelled doom for employment lawsuits facing other big U.S. companies.

A landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision last month siding with the world’s largest retailer was widely seen as a blow to many other would-be class-action plaintiffs.

 But some employment class-action lawsuits, particularly those involving disputes over overtime and other wage-and-hour claims, are surviving and have even been strengthened by the ruling, as judges have issued opinions arguing the Wal-Mart decision does not apply to a given case.

The Wal-Mart case centered on whether a group of up to 1.5 million current and former workers at the retailer, who contended they were paid less than men and denied promotions, was properly certified as a class. The Supreme Court said the women could not sue jointly, finding they did not have enough in common to band together.

Plaintiffs who sue en masse have more power, because they can pool resources and combine claims into one lawsuit. Following the Supreme Court’s June 20 ruling, Wal-Mart workers will now have to sue in smaller groups or as individuals.

In the past three weeks, courts and attorneys have rushed to interpret the ruling. A day after the decision, a federal judge in New York ruled that about 600 employees of Tyco International Ltd unit SimplexGrinnell can sue jointly on their claims that they were underpaid.

On June 29, a federal judge in Florida denied Starbucks Corp.’s attempt to decertify a class of more than 700 workers in a lawsuit on overtime pay, saying there were enough similarities to justify keeping class members together.

That same week, a federal judge in California denied trucking company C.R. England Inc.’s attempt to decertify a class of up to 1,000 drivers in a wage-and-hour class action, and a federal judge in Ohio upheld class certification in a similar case against nursing home company HCR ManorCare.

Read More at Insurancejourmal.com

Moira Herbst; Editing by Martha Graybow and Tim Dobbyn)

Comments:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Author of this article: Moira Herbst; Editing by Martha Graybow and Tim Dobbyn)
More articles :

» Managing Older Workers: A Solution For Skilled Worker Shortage

The nightmare that is plaguing many companies as the economy recovers is the lack of skilled workers. There is no one cause for the shortages but a significant driver is the loss of Baby Boomer brain power.  But the good news is that there can be a...

» SHRM: Economy Negatively Impacted Employee Benefits More in 2011

Employers increasingly turn over responsibility for managing retirement, leave and health care benefits to employees LAS VEGAS — The economy negatively affected the employee benefits offered by more than three-quarters of organizations, according...

» Speeding Labor Elections Unfair to Companies, Employers Say

Speeding labor elections would deny companies a fair chance of persuading workers to reject organized representation, employers are telling U.S. regulators.The , which investigates unfair-labor practices, is considering adoption of steps sought by...

» Rrevisiting Contingency Contract Hypocrisy – Part 2

I imagine at some point back in the 60’s and 70’s the concept of providing recruiting services under a contingency arrangement made since. Back then many “employment agencies” as they were known, were exactly just that: Clearing houses for...

» Companies sue employees over LinkedIn, Twitter accounts

Suits raise the issue of ownership of social media profiles for company purposesThe scenarios may be quite different, but claims in two lawsuits have now survived the motion-to-dismiss phase and are grabbing employers’ attention as they raise the...