HireCentrix News Updates
DynCorp International Sued For Sex-Based Harassment And Retaliation
Male Employee Subjected to Male Co-worker’s Derogatory Sexual Comments
ALEXANDRIA, VA. – DynCorp International, LLC, a United States based private military contractor and aircraft maintenance company, violated federal law by subjecting a male employee to a hostile work environment based on his sex, and by transferring him after he complained, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today.
According to the EEOC’s complaint, from October 2006 through January 2007, James Friso, an aircraft sheet metal/structura
l mechanic working in Taji, Iraq, was subjected to harassment based on his sex by a male co-worker. The lawsuit alleges the harassment included daily derogatory sex-based comments, accusations that Friso is gay and engaged in homosexual acts, and descriptions of homosexual acts. Friso, who is heterosexual, is 5’4” and of small stature. He is married, and the co-worker knew that Friso is married and is not homosexual.
The lawsuit alleges that despite this knowledge, the harasser subjected Friso to the harassment because Friso did not match the gender stereotype for a man. Although Friso complained to DynCorp’s management and human resources representatives about the co-worker’s unwelcome and offensive conduct, the harassment continued until Frisco was transferred to another work site. The complaint alleges that Friso’s transfer was in retaliation for his complaints about the harassment.
DynCorp receives more than 96 percent of its $2 billion in annual revenues from the federal government. It employed approximately 16,800 people in 2009.
Sex-based harassment is a form of sex discrimination, and violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. DynCorp International, LLC, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-874) after first attempting to reach a voluntary settlement. The agency seeks back pay for Friso, along with compensatory and punitive damages, and injunctive relief.
“Employers need to remember that sex discrimination includes harassment based on sexual stereotyping. Once an employee complains of sex-based harassment in the workplace, the employer is required under federal law to act reasonably to prevent further harassment,” said Lynette A. Barnes, regional attorney for EEOC’s Charlotte District, whose jurisdiction includes the state of Virginia. “Furthermore, federal law forbids employers from retaliating against employees who report sexual harassment. The EEOC will aggressively prosecute cases where the employer turns a blind eye to known sexual harassment or retaliates against the victim for complaining.”
Healthcare Costs grew a cumulative 138% between 1999 and 2010 and outpacing cumulative wage growth of 42% over the same period. Average employer costs for health insurance per employee hour rose from $1.60 to $3.35 during the 1999 to 2010 period. This almost 110% increase in average costs per hour was much larger than the 39% increase in average employer payroll costs per hour for these workers KFF
We have 440 guests and no members online
*The Lounge Podcast*
- How Your Business Can Support Family Involvement In Education -- and Benefit
- Why Most Recruiting Firm Owners Business Plans Fail
- 5 Questions Employers Should Ask Job Applicants in Interviews for Safe Hiring
- San Diego Staffing Agency Reach Agreement on Discrimination Case Involving Recruitment and Hiring
- It's the Height of Audacity to Claim a Skilled Worker "Shortage" When 20% of American Skilled Craft Workers Are Unemployed