Be our Friend    

   
Text Size
Login Newsletter Sign-up

Keyword Search HCX for your Favorite Author / Content

China and employment height discrimination

Digg it!Share in FacebookTweet it!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

In May, 2004,* the New York Times reported on a disturbing phenomenon in the People's Republic of China: Otherwise highly qualified applicants for government jobs are being turned down because they are too short (and often just barely so). As part of an effort to put the nation's "best face" forward in the global economy, Chinese ministries have adopted height and other aesthetics requirements.

In May, the New York Times reported on a disturbing phenomenon in the People's Republic of China: Otherwise highly qualified applicants for government jobs are being turned down because they are too short (and often just barely so). As part of an effort to put the nation's "best face" forward in the global economy, Chinese ministries have adopted height and other aesthetics requirements.

But the law even permits the Knicks to deny me a job as a popcorn vendor if, on purely aesthetic grounds, the team decides that it wants all of its male salespeople to be over six foot two. (The team would be engaging in sex discrimination if it applied the same height requirement to female popcorn vendors, but no provision of federal law prohibits favoring tall men over short men, along with tall women over short women).

How about state law? New York State law goes beyond federal law in prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, but not height. And although California's anti-discrimination law has been interpreted by that state's supreme court to bar all arbitrary and intentional discrimination, the New York law has not been read quite so broadly.

Will the federal Constitution help me obtain a position hawking popcorn in Madison Square Garden? Fat chance. Its equal protection clause only bars discrimination by the government, and the Knicks are not a state-run enterprise.

Read More

Michael C. Dorf, a FindLaw columnist, is professor of law at Columbia University. His new book, "Constitutional Law Stories," is published by Foundation Press, and te Save lls the stories behind 15 leading constitutional cases.


 * Note, though this article is a few years old, the information is still accurate today.

Comments:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Author of this article: Michael C. Dorf
More articles :

» Background Check Wrongly Says Job Seeker is Sex Offender

 Samuel Jackson thought his job offer from Optics Planet was a done deal -- but then a routine background check gone awry surprised the company and Jackson with a detail even he didn't know: his name appeared on national list of registered sex...

» Three-fifths of all income growth from 1979-2007 went to the top 1%

Occupy Wall Street is right about nation’s skewed economic rewardsToday, the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) released a report on economic inequality in the U.S. that explains that the Occupy Wall Street movement is fundamentally right about how...

» BACKSTABBERS LOSE

Whatever are people thinking when they are two-faced?  Are they really thinking that people are stupid and can't see the forest for the trees?When meetings take place surreptitiously, behind closed doors and blinds, suspicion builds.  I was...

» Obese women are discriminated against when applying for jobs, and get lower pay, according to a new study.

Obese women are more likely to be discriminated against when applying for jobs and receive lower starting salaries than their non-overweight colleagues, a new study has found.

» Volkswagen turns off email for BlackBerry workers

Volkswagen has agreed to turn off emails to workers with BlackBerry devices to help their work-life balance.If you feel like you are never disconnected from your work and you are sick of that flashing red light on your BlackBerry announcing yet...