Be our Friend    

   
Text Size
Login Newsletter Sign-up

Keyword Search HCX for your Favorite Author / Content

California Supreme Court Rejects Employees Right to Sue for Misappropriated Tips But An Unfair Competition Law Cause of Action Remains

Digg it!Share in FacebookTweet it!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Introduction : On August 8, 2010, the California Supreme Court, in Lu v. Hawaiian Gardens Casino, No. S171442, decided that employees do not have a private right of action under Labor Code section 351 to pursue remedies for misappropriated tips. However, the California Supreme Court did not decide nor prevent an unfair competition law

(UCL) cause of action predicated on Labor Code section 351. The exposure of a UCL cause of action against employers for providing tips to "agents" of the employer remains. As stated in our April 2009 ASAP, California Appellate Court Protects Employers Who Allow Tips for Dishwashers, California restaurant and service employers whose employees receive tips should review and maintain proper tip-pooling policies.

Factual & Procedural Background

California Labor Code section 351 provides that a tip is the sole property of the employee to whom it was paid and not the employer or manager.

Plaintiff Louie Hung Kwei Lu (Lu) was employed as a card dealer at defendant Hawaiian Gardens Casino, Inc. (the Casino), from 1997 to 2003. The casino had a written tip-pooling policy that required dealers to set aside 15 to 20 percent of the tips they received on each shift. The dealers kept the remaining 80 to 85 percent of the tips received; the casino did not deduct these sums from the minimum hourly wages the dealers earned. The casino deposited the pooled tips into a "tip pool bank account" and later distributed the money to designated employees who provided service to casino customers. These employees included chip service people, poker tournament coordinators, poker rotation coordinators, hosts, customer service representatives or "floormen," and concierges. The tip pool policy specifically prohibited employers, managers, and supervisors from receiving any money from the tip pool.

Read More

By:
Matthew Marca
Guissu Raafat  for Littler Mendelson

Comments:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Author of this article: Littler Mendelson
More articles :

» Pew Research : In Two Years of Economic Recovery, Women Lost Jobs, Men Found Them

The sluggish recovery from the Great Recession has been better for men than for women. From the end of the recession in June 2009 through May 2011, men gained 768,000 jobs and lowered their unemployment rate by 1.1 percentage points to 9.5%....

» Reviewing Private Social Media Accounts as a Candidate Screening Tool:

Dangerous, even with Policies & ProceduresTOO MUCH INFORMATION!By now you will have heard that some employers are (1) asking job candidates to provide their private social media log-in information, or (2) asking job candidates to log-in during...

» Staffing firm who denied a man a Job Because of Murder Conviction loses Discrimination Lawsuit

Settlement Reached in Ex-Offender Employment Discrimination CaseIntegrity Staffing Solutions, the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia and Berger & Montague, P.C. jointly announce the successful resolution of a claim brought by Al Dunn, an...

» Talent management strategies for the rolling talent deficit (part 1)

As you probably know, the U.S. government operates with a staggering fiscal deficit. It’s projected that we will fall short by about  this year. That amount of money is hard to imagine, and is largely ignored as we go about our daily lives.But...

» Costco Workers’ Group Case Blocked After Wal-Mart Ruling

Costco Wholesale Corp. won a ruling voiding a judge’s decision to expand a sex-bias suit filed by three women to include hundreds of female workers.A federal appeals court in San Francisco today said U.S. District Judge Marilyn H. Patel applied...